 |
Industry Reports
| Report No. |
IP67(jot this number down to
order) |
| Title |
Comparison of Laboratory Test Performance Between
Asphalt-Rubber Hot Mix and Dense Graded Asphalt Concrete |
| Author(s) |
Souse, Jorge; Pais, Jorge & Stubstad, Richard |
| Publisher |
RPA/Consulpav |
| Pub. Date |
|
| Pages |
12 pages |
| Keywords |
|
| Description |
Asphalt-Rubber Hot-Mix has shown a higher resistance
to flexural and reflective fatigue cracking, and also to permanent deformation,
than conventional Dense Graded Asphalt Concrete. Experience has demonstrated
that with ARHM, a significant reduction in overlay thickness is possible,
especially in cases where the existing pavement is cracked. This paper reports
the efforts done on behalf of the RPA to develop a mechanistic design method to
quantify the rehabilitation performance ARHM and DFAC mixes. Based on the
results of widely available performance related tests, such as flexural
fatigue, repetitive simple shear, wheel track, and permanent deformation tests,
combined with traditionally adopted mechanistic-empirical modeling tools,
equivalency factors in terms of required overlay thickness have derived.
|
| Postage |
$ 2.00 : U.S.
$ 2.20 : Canada/Mexico
$ 2.40 : Rest of the World |
|